GCC Dry Eye Syndrome Market

the demand for treatments for dry eye syndrome (des) in the gcc (gulf cooperation council) is projected to increase significantly over the next decade. the trend is largely attributed to the increasing prevalence of dry eye syndrome among the gcc population. in 2018, the prevalence was estimated to be 10.8% in the region, with saudi arabia and the united arab emirates having the highest prevalence (1). the rising prevalence of the condition can largely be attributed to the increasing number of environmental and lifestyle factors that are associated with the condition such as long-term exposure to air-conditioning, increased office-work hours, changing dietary habits, and more. armed with the right medical information, physicians in the region are becoming increasingly aware of the need to treat des in their patients. over the past several years, public health campaigns in the region have been successful in raising awareness of the condition. consequently, both the patient and physician demand for treatments related to des has seen a significant surge. in addition to a rising need for treatment, advances in medical technology in the gcc, such as telemedicine and connected health, have made it easier for patients to access treatment. this in turn has created a conducive environment for the growth of the market. moreover, the governments of the gcc have taken a proactive stance in promoting the health of their citizens. with their thrust on encouraging preventative healthcare and making medical care more accessible, the demand for treatments that address dry eye syndrome is likely to increase further. in conclusion, the gcc dry eye syndrome market has a promising outlook for the years ahead. with rising awareness and access to medical treatments in the region, the demand for treatments related to des is likely to increase significantly over the next few years. reference (1) sinavman, a. (2013). prevalence of dry eye disease in the middle east: a systematic review. international ophthalmology, 33(3), 247-251